What does it mean to be repetitive? Sometimes I laugh at the comments of reviewers who bash authors saying they’re book is repetitive. They really hammer them stating that they’re book isn’t saying anything new. Or that they’ve heard it all before.
So I often wondered whether the author is repetitive or is it just that the reviewer that’s simply out of practice?
So in order to make themselves feel good, they let that author have it. I mean seriously…why come out with a book that says everything they already know?
“Are these authors kidding me?”
“Are they for real?”